Comments on: Raw Milk Enforcement Moves to Alberta, Canada

By: Gordon S Watson

Gordon S Watson — Fri, 26 Apr 2019 03:24:51 +0000

the comment by Shaye Dupuis asks “What is the real goal here?”. The answer is found in the Progressive Economic Program, put out by the Fabian Society, back in the late 1920s. They proposed a command economy, in which a centrally-directed Marketing Board would dictate quantity and prices of various commodities essential to the economy … milk being one of them. All the countries which tried the quota scheme, have given it up. Only the Dominion of Canada refuses to de-Stalin-ize. All comedy aside : the Fabian society used control of the dairy industry as one of the ways to bring the ( formerly ) white Christian nations under communism, by substituting the Image of milk = the thin, whitish ersatz fluid falsely labelled “homo milk”, instead of REAL MILK. And the nation’s health declined accordingly. Not just a mere co-incidence, that.

By: robert francis

robert francis — Fri, 12 Apr 2019 05:06:44 +0000

Here’s the problem the corporate American states of the UNITED KINGDOM (mother corporation) is run by a bunch of traitor attorney’s who are known as esquires, and the term esquire is a title of nobility, apprentices to the Knights Templar’s of Parliament, known today as Benchers. They originated out of the Middle Temple Inn of court, Inner city London. They hold legal title over the American states through the American Bar Association. They bound our LEGAL NAMES through various contracts to their jurisdiction as DEBTORS (slaves) and since we LEGALLY give our consent to be their subjects, then we lose all of our right to drink raw milk because an attorney says so… Think about it, out of the hundreds of thousands of their so called laws that they have on the books, how many were designed to give us freedom? NONE! Sorry to be the one to inform you, but we actually lost the revolutionary war, because we chose to adopt the Brits LEGAL/banking system against our own natural born sovereignty and freedoms, in return we get a few subjectively interpreted rights, a few liberties and some easily repudiated privileges.

By: Tim Atchison

Tim Atchison — Tue, 02 Apr 2019 12:44:04 +0000

Here’s a perfect reason to separate from the East. It’s time we take our lives back I was raised on both store bought milk and raw milk I’m 55 and still going and my kids were brought up the same . With all these new laws they control the family farm which is wrong at this rate you won’t even bearable to sell vegetables soon. Time to stand up and say NO MORE.

By: Al Matheson

Al Matheson — Tue, 02 Apr 2019 02:51:23 +0000

Obviously this is one of the many reasons the RCMP has no resources to investigate the traitors known as the Liberal government Way too busy imposing injustice on personal choice and freedoms.

By: Tammy

Tammy — Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:40:21 +0000

The government needs to stay out of it! If I want raw milk for myself and my family it’s none of their business… If they’re worried about people getting sick they should focus on the pesticides and hormones they permit just to start with!

By: Sophie La Rochelle

Sophie La Rochelle — Wed, 20 Mar 2019 17:48:11 +0000

I would love to be able to buy raw milk ,better for you then that milk they sale in the store which we can not drink because we get sick from it.we go to France and we have no problems with dairies product and raw milk there.where is our freedom to eat what we want ,we are not stupid .

By: Shaye Dupuis

Shaye Dupuis — Wed, 20 Mar 2019 14:00:02 +0000

I would drink raw milk over pasteurized any day. Pasteurized milk makes me sick and ill. While raw milk I can drink a ton of and still feel great afterwards.
Killing the “bad” in the milk to make it “safe” also removes a majority of its benefits.
Why mess with simple organic food and turn it into lab projects.? I do understand many are for genetically modified foods but thier is also much evidence showing the nutrients and benefits of fruits and vegetables greatly increase when grown with great care. Quality over quantity.
Allow people to make their own decisions and quit trying to control everything simply because it cannot be government regulated does not mean it needs to penalized.
If look through the statistics of other countries where control is removed for exmample drug laws the people became healthier on their own and issues lessened over time.
Take a large spread issues and place them into small frames. Is it control based or is out of understanding and acknowledgment?
What is the real goal here?