Comments on: The Johns Hopkins Raw Milk Study

By: Chef Jemichel

Chef Jemichel — Tue, 04 Oct 2016 09:45:11 +0000

Health may be a prime concern (supposedly) on either side of the legal argument however from a “Food Rights” perspective that debate is not the essential issue; Lawful jurisdiction is! Every State government has adopted the proprietary-based jurisdiction of the “United States” government in their State Constitutions. Therefor people need to know what the proprietary limits are or they do not have the land-based “standing” in these arguments. When the Constitution of September 17th, 1787 is seen in its proper light (within the context of the other Organic Laws) then the limits of the “proprietary-based jurisdiction of the ‘United States’ government” can be seen consisting of the property that is actually owned by government and under government’s exclusive legislative authority. In other words – Lawful State government authority is just as limited in its jurisdiction as the United Sates Congress is (and described in Art I, Sec 8, Clause 17) and all apparent “evidence” to the contrary is truly indicative of the expansion of government beyond the proprietary limits set forth in written law. But until the American people recover their true “Organic Laws” heritage they will believe what government claims as its authority – even where it is not authorized by the people!

By: marion branham

marion branham — Tue, 31 May 2016 16:42:28 +0000

In Georgia, You can buy raw milk, but only if it is labeled as ” For Pets Only “. Going to buy some for yourself feels like you are going on a dope run. In South Carolina, It’s all cool. Buy all ya want.

By: Janet Croneberger

Janet Croneberger — Fri, 18 Sep 2015 21:54:21 +0000

Bottom line is if I want to drink raw milk that is my business and nobody else’s and farms who sell it should not have to be penalized for selling healthy food in its natural state.

By: rawmilkmike

rawmilkmike — Fri, 18 Sep 2015 15:54:05 +0000

I have never seen “a bill to legalize the sale of raw milk in” any state. What I have seen are bills for additional legislation regarding the sale of fresh drinking milk. These bills will not put raw milk in our supermarkets and will only make direct farm sales more difficult.

It is silly to think that any food could actually be illegal to sell to people who wish to buy it. It is the states responsibility to make sure the people get the food they are looking for, not to force them to buy what producers want to sell.

What we have are illegal de facto bans on the sale of fresh milk. This is done by bogus interpretations of statutes, ignoring question, ignoring the letter and intent of the law, and or by making up nonexistent laws. In Wisconsin the state already has the ability and the responsibility to properly interpret cure exemptions and to write exceptions for anyone else wishing to sell raw milk to people who want to buy it from them.